The UCI is dead to me..

The UCI doesn’t understand production outlays, forcasting, manufacturing protocalls, economics,  bio-mechanics, aerodynamics and yet they announce new rules that negatively effect all of the before mentioned. Put a fuckin bike racer in charge and fire the overthinker!

Is that 8 x 2.5cm or 3:1? Confusion surrounding obscure UCI rule has teams in panic

Team management and mechanics were awash in panic after rumours swirled that the UCI would be rigidly enforcing a new technical rule at this Friday’s time trial in Solvang – not beginning in 2010, as many had apparently assumed.

UCI technical ruling 1.3.024 – which was just modified on 1 Jan 2009 – states that, “A fuselage form shall be defined as an extension or streamlining of a section. This shall be tolerated as long as the ratio between the length (L) and the diameter (D) does not exceed 3.”

Previously the rules stated only that cross-sections of any particular frame or component had to fit within an 8 x 2.5cm rectangle. By that definition, all of the equipment currently planned for use on Friday is legal. However, if the 3-to-1 rule is applied, nearly every team currently listed on the Tour of California roster is headed for disaster unless some sort of contingency plan is put into effect.

Among the equipment violations would be virtually every aero handlebar currently in use (with one notable exception being Bontrager), many aero seatposts, some wheels and possibly even some frames.

The potential penalties for violating the ruling are undoubtedly severe: either the rider would simply not be allowed to start with the equipment in question, or the rule could be retroactively applied and the applicable performance could be disqualified.

Alternate options discussed by various teams range from incredibly inconvenient to downright impossible: scores of aero handlebars would have to be both obtained and installed prior to Friday or riders would be forced to use their road bikes on the decisive stage.

On a more general note, the ruling could also threaten the very existence of a number of aero equipment manufacturers including Oval Concepts, Vision and 3T. Stay tuned for additional information.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Comments are closed.